9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal 9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 9 876 543 210 009 876.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 9 876 543 210 009 876 ÷ 2 = 4 938 271 605 004 938 + 0;
  • 4 938 271 605 004 938 ÷ 2 = 2 469 135 802 502 469 + 0;
  • 2 469 135 802 502 469 ÷ 2 = 1 234 567 901 251 234 + 1;
  • 1 234 567 901 251 234 ÷ 2 = 617 283 950 625 617 + 0;
  • 617 283 950 625 617 ÷ 2 = 308 641 975 312 808 + 1;
  • 308 641 975 312 808 ÷ 2 = 154 320 987 656 404 + 0;
  • 154 320 987 656 404 ÷ 2 = 77 160 493 828 202 + 0;
  • 77 160 493 828 202 ÷ 2 = 38 580 246 914 101 + 0;
  • 38 580 246 914 101 ÷ 2 = 19 290 123 457 050 + 1;
  • 19 290 123 457 050 ÷ 2 = 9 645 061 728 525 + 0;
  • 9 645 061 728 525 ÷ 2 = 4 822 530 864 262 + 1;
  • 4 822 530 864 262 ÷ 2 = 2 411 265 432 131 + 0;
  • 2 411 265 432 131 ÷ 2 = 1 205 632 716 065 + 1;
  • 1 205 632 716 065 ÷ 2 = 602 816 358 032 + 1;
  • 602 816 358 032 ÷ 2 = 301 408 179 016 + 0;
  • 301 408 179 016 ÷ 2 = 150 704 089 508 + 0;
  • 150 704 089 508 ÷ 2 = 75 352 044 754 + 0;
  • 75 352 044 754 ÷ 2 = 37 676 022 377 + 0;
  • 37 676 022 377 ÷ 2 = 18 838 011 188 + 1;
  • 18 838 011 188 ÷ 2 = 9 419 005 594 + 0;
  • 9 419 005 594 ÷ 2 = 4 709 502 797 + 0;
  • 4 709 502 797 ÷ 2 = 2 354 751 398 + 1;
  • 2 354 751 398 ÷ 2 = 1 177 375 699 + 0;
  • 1 177 375 699 ÷ 2 = 588 687 849 + 1;
  • 588 687 849 ÷ 2 = 294 343 924 + 1;
  • 294 343 924 ÷ 2 = 147 171 962 + 0;
  • 147 171 962 ÷ 2 = 73 585 981 + 0;
  • 73 585 981 ÷ 2 = 36 792 990 + 1;
  • 36 792 990 ÷ 2 = 18 396 495 + 0;
  • 18 396 495 ÷ 2 = 9 198 247 + 1;
  • 9 198 247 ÷ 2 = 4 599 123 + 1;
  • 4 599 123 ÷ 2 = 2 299 561 + 1;
  • 2 299 561 ÷ 2 = 1 149 780 + 1;
  • 1 149 780 ÷ 2 = 574 890 + 0;
  • 574 890 ÷ 2 = 287 445 + 0;
  • 287 445 ÷ 2 = 143 722 + 1;
  • 143 722 ÷ 2 = 71 861 + 0;
  • 71 861 ÷ 2 = 35 930 + 1;
  • 35 930 ÷ 2 = 17 965 + 0;
  • 17 965 ÷ 2 = 8 982 + 1;
  • 8 982 ÷ 2 = 4 491 + 0;
  • 4 491 ÷ 2 = 2 245 + 1;
  • 2 245 ÷ 2 = 1 122 + 1;
  • 1 122 ÷ 2 = 561 + 0;
  • 561 ÷ 2 = 280 + 1;
  • 280 ÷ 2 = 140 + 0;
  • 140 ÷ 2 = 70 + 0;
  • 70 ÷ 2 = 35 + 0;
  • 35 ÷ 2 = 17 + 1;
  • 17 ÷ 2 = 8 + 1;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

2. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

9 876 543 210 009 876(10) =


10 0011 0001 0110 1010 1001 1110 1001 1010 0100 0011 0101 0001 0100(2)


3. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.009 234 553 9.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.


Keep track of each integer part of the results.


Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.009 234 553 9 × 2 = 0 + 0.018 469 107 8;
  • 2) 0.018 469 107 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.036 938 215 6;
  • 3) 0.036 938 215 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.073 876 431 2;
  • 4) 0.073 876 431 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.147 752 862 4;
  • 5) 0.147 752 862 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.295 505 724 8;
  • 6) 0.295 505 724 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.591 011 449 6;
  • 7) 0.591 011 449 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.182 022 899 2;
  • 8) 0.182 022 899 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.364 045 798 4;
  • 9) 0.364 045 798 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.728 091 596 8;
  • 10) 0.728 091 596 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.456 183 193 6;
  • 11) 0.456 183 193 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.912 366 387 2;
  • 12) 0.912 366 387 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.824 732 774 4;
  • 13) 0.824 732 774 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.649 465 548 8;
  • 14) 0.649 465 548 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.298 931 097 6;
  • 15) 0.298 931 097 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.597 862 195 2;
  • 16) 0.597 862 195 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.195 724 390 4;
  • 17) 0.195 724 390 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.391 448 780 8;
  • 18) 0.391 448 780 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.782 897 561 6;
  • 19) 0.782 897 561 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.565 795 123 2;
  • 20) 0.565 795 123 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.131 590 246 4;
  • 21) 0.131 590 246 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.263 180 492 8;
  • 22) 0.263 180 492 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.526 360 985 6;
  • 23) 0.526 360 985 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.052 721 971 2;
  • 24) 0.052 721 971 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.105 443 942 4;
  • 25) 0.105 443 942 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.210 887 884 8;
  • 26) 0.210 887 884 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.421 775 769 6;
  • 27) 0.421 775 769 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.843 551 539 2;
  • 28) 0.843 551 539 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.687 103 078 4;
  • 29) 0.687 103 078 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.374 206 156 8;
  • 30) 0.374 206 156 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.748 412 313 6;
  • 31) 0.748 412 313 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.496 824 627 2;
  • 32) 0.496 824 627 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.993 649 254 4;
  • 33) 0.993 649 254 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.987 298 508 8;
  • 34) 0.987 298 508 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.974 597 017 6;
  • 35) 0.974 597 017 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.949 194 035 2;
  • 36) 0.949 194 035 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.898 388 070 4;
  • 37) 0.898 388 070 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.796 776 140 8;
  • 38) 0.796 776 140 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.593 552 281 6;
  • 39) 0.593 552 281 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.187 104 563 2;
  • 40) 0.187 104 563 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.374 209 126 4;
  • 41) 0.374 209 126 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.748 418 252 8;
  • 42) 0.748 418 252 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.496 836 505 6;
  • 43) 0.496 836 505 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.993 673 011 2;
  • 44) 0.993 673 011 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.987 346 022 4;
  • 45) 0.987 346 022 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.974 692 044 8;
  • 46) 0.974 692 044 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.949 384 089 6;
  • 47) 0.949 384 089 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.898 768 179 2;
  • 48) 0.898 768 179 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.797 536 358 4;
  • 49) 0.797 536 358 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.595 072 716 8;
  • 50) 0.595 072 716 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.190 145 433 6;
  • 51) 0.190 145 433 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.380 290 867 2;
  • 52) 0.380 290 867 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.760 581 734 4;
  • 53) 0.760 581 734 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.521 163 468 8;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


4. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.009 234 553 9(10) =


0.0000 0010 0101 1101 0011 0010 0001 1010 1111 1110 0101 1111 1100 1(2)

5. Positive number before normalization:

9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9(10) =


10 0011 0001 0110 1010 1001 1110 1001 1010 0100 0011 0101 0001 0100.0000 0010 0101 1101 0011 0010 0001 1010 1111 1110 0101 1111 1100 1(2)

6. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 53 positions to the left, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9(10) =


10 0011 0001 0110 1010 1001 1110 1001 1010 0100 0011 0101 0001 0100.0000 0010 0101 1101 0011 0010 0001 1010 1111 1110 0101 1111 1100 1(2) =


10 0011 0001 0110 1010 1001 1110 1001 1010 0100 0011 0101 0001 0100.0000 0010 0101 1101 0011 0010 0001 1010 1111 1110 0101 1111 1100 1(2) × 20 =


1.0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010 0000 0001 0010 1110 1001 1001 0000 1101 0111 1111 0010 1111 1110 01(2) × 253


7. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 0 (a positive number)


Exponent (unadjusted): 53


Mantissa (not normalized):
1.0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010 0000 0001 0010 1110 1001 1001 0000 1101 0111 1111 0010 1111 1110 01


8. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =


Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =


53 + 2(11-1) - 1 =


(53 + 1 023)(10) =


1 076(10)


9. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 076 ÷ 2 = 538 + 0;
  • 538 ÷ 2 = 269 + 0;
  • 269 ÷ 2 = 134 + 1;
  • 134 ÷ 2 = 67 + 0;
  • 67 ÷ 2 = 33 + 1;
  • 33 ÷ 2 = 16 + 1;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

10. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =


1076(10) =


100 0011 0100(2)


11. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.


b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (if any of the excess bits is set on 1, we are losing precision...).


Mantissa (normalized) =


1. 0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010 00 0000 0100 1011 1010 0110 0100 0011 0101 1111 1100 1011 1111 1001 =


0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010


12. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
0 (a positive number)


Exponent (11 bits) =
100 0011 0100


Mantissa (52 bits) =
0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010


Decimal number 9 876 543 210 009 876.009 234 553 9 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

0 - 100 0011 0100 - 0001 1000 1011 0101 0100 1111 0100 1101 0010 0001 1010 1000 1010


How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100