752 268 882.822 498 3 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal 752 268 882.822 498 3(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
752 268 882.822 498 3(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 752 268 882.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 752 268 882 ÷ 2 = 376 134 441 + 0;
  • 376 134 441 ÷ 2 = 188 067 220 + 1;
  • 188 067 220 ÷ 2 = 94 033 610 + 0;
  • 94 033 610 ÷ 2 = 47 016 805 + 0;
  • 47 016 805 ÷ 2 = 23 508 402 + 1;
  • 23 508 402 ÷ 2 = 11 754 201 + 0;
  • 11 754 201 ÷ 2 = 5 877 100 + 1;
  • 5 877 100 ÷ 2 = 2 938 550 + 0;
  • 2 938 550 ÷ 2 = 1 469 275 + 0;
  • 1 469 275 ÷ 2 = 734 637 + 1;
  • 734 637 ÷ 2 = 367 318 + 1;
  • 367 318 ÷ 2 = 183 659 + 0;
  • 183 659 ÷ 2 = 91 829 + 1;
  • 91 829 ÷ 2 = 45 914 + 1;
  • 45 914 ÷ 2 = 22 957 + 0;
  • 22 957 ÷ 2 = 11 478 + 1;
  • 11 478 ÷ 2 = 5 739 + 0;
  • 5 739 ÷ 2 = 2 869 + 1;
  • 2 869 ÷ 2 = 1 434 + 1;
  • 1 434 ÷ 2 = 717 + 0;
  • 717 ÷ 2 = 358 + 1;
  • 358 ÷ 2 = 179 + 0;
  • 179 ÷ 2 = 89 + 1;
  • 89 ÷ 2 = 44 + 1;
  • 44 ÷ 2 = 22 + 0;
  • 22 ÷ 2 = 11 + 0;
  • 11 ÷ 2 = 5 + 1;
  • 5 ÷ 2 = 2 + 1;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

2. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

752 268 882(10) =


10 1100 1101 0110 1011 0110 0101 0010(2)


3. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.822 498 3.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.


Keep track of each integer part of the results.


Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.822 498 3 × 2 = 1 + 0.644 996 6;
  • 2) 0.644 996 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.289 993 2;
  • 3) 0.289 993 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.579 986 4;
  • 4) 0.579 986 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.159 972 8;
  • 5) 0.159 972 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.319 945 6;
  • 6) 0.319 945 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.639 891 2;
  • 7) 0.639 891 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.279 782 4;
  • 8) 0.279 782 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.559 564 8;
  • 9) 0.559 564 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.119 129 6;
  • 10) 0.119 129 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.238 259 2;
  • 11) 0.238 259 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.476 518 4;
  • 12) 0.476 518 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.953 036 8;
  • 13) 0.953 036 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.906 073 6;
  • 14) 0.906 073 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.812 147 2;
  • 15) 0.812 147 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.624 294 4;
  • 16) 0.624 294 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.248 588 8;
  • 17) 0.248 588 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.497 177 6;
  • 18) 0.497 177 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.994 355 2;
  • 19) 0.994 355 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.988 710 4;
  • 20) 0.988 710 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.977 420 8;
  • 21) 0.977 420 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.954 841 6;
  • 22) 0.954 841 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.909 683 2;
  • 23) 0.909 683 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.819 366 4;
  • 24) 0.819 366 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.638 732 8;
  • 25) 0.638 732 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.277 465 6;
  • 26) 0.277 465 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.554 931 2;
  • 27) 0.554 931 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.109 862 4;
  • 28) 0.109 862 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.219 724 8;
  • 29) 0.219 724 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.439 449 6;
  • 30) 0.439 449 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.878 899 2;
  • 31) 0.878 899 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.757 798 4;
  • 32) 0.757 798 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.515 596 8;
  • 33) 0.515 596 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.031 193 6;
  • 34) 0.031 193 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.062 387 2;
  • 35) 0.062 387 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.124 774 4;
  • 36) 0.124 774 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.249 548 8;
  • 37) 0.249 548 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.499 097 6;
  • 38) 0.499 097 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.998 195 2;
  • 39) 0.998 195 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.996 390 4;
  • 40) 0.996 390 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.992 780 8;
  • 41) 0.992 780 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.985 561 6;
  • 42) 0.985 561 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.971 123 2;
  • 43) 0.971 123 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.942 246 4;
  • 44) 0.942 246 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.884 492 8;
  • 45) 0.884 492 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.768 985 6;
  • 46) 0.768 985 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.537 971 2;
  • 47) 0.537 971 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.075 942 4;
  • 48) 0.075 942 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.151 884 8;
  • 49) 0.151 884 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.303 769 6;
  • 50) 0.303 769 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.607 539 2;
  • 51) 0.607 539 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.215 078 4;
  • 52) 0.215 078 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.430 156 8;
  • 53) 0.430 156 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.860 313 6;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


4. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.822 498 3(10) =


0.1101 0010 1000 1111 0011 1111 1010 0011 1000 0011 1111 1110 0010 0(2)

5. Positive number before normalization:

752 268 882.822 498 3(10) =


10 1100 1101 0110 1011 0110 0101 0010.1101 0010 1000 1111 0011 1111 1010 0011 1000 0011 1111 1110 0010 0(2)

6. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 29 positions to the left, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


752 268 882.822 498 3(10) =


10 1100 1101 0110 1011 0110 0101 0010.1101 0010 1000 1111 0011 1111 1010 0011 1000 0011 1111 1110 0010 0(2) =


10 1100 1101 0110 1011 0110 0101 0010.1101 0010 1000 1111 0011 1111 1010 0011 1000 0011 1111 1110 0010 0(2) × 20 =


1.0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111 1101 0001 1100 0001 1111 1111 0001 00(2) × 229


7. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 0 (a positive number)


Exponent (unadjusted): 29


Mantissa (not normalized):
1.0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111 1101 0001 1100 0001 1111 1111 0001 00


8. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =


Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =


29 + 2(11-1) - 1 =


(29 + 1 023)(10) =


1 052(10)


9. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 052 ÷ 2 = 526 + 0;
  • 526 ÷ 2 = 263 + 0;
  • 263 ÷ 2 = 131 + 1;
  • 131 ÷ 2 = 65 + 1;
  • 65 ÷ 2 = 32 + 1;
  • 32 ÷ 2 = 16 + 0;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

10. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =


1052(10) =


100 0001 1100(2)


11. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.


b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (if any of the excess bits is set on 1, we are losing precision...).


Mantissa (normalized) =


1. 0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111 11 0100 0111 0000 0111 1111 1100 0100 =


0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111


12. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
0 (a positive number)


Exponent (11 bits) =
100 0001 1100


Mantissa (52 bits) =
0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111


Decimal number 752 268 882.822 498 3 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

0 - 100 0001 1100 - 0110 0110 1011 0101 1011 0010 1001 0110 1001 0100 0111 1001 1111


How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100