599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal 599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 599 584 915.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 599 584 915 ÷ 2 = 299 792 457 + 1;
  • 299 792 457 ÷ 2 = 149 896 228 + 1;
  • 149 896 228 ÷ 2 = 74 948 114 + 0;
  • 74 948 114 ÷ 2 = 37 474 057 + 0;
  • 37 474 057 ÷ 2 = 18 737 028 + 1;
  • 18 737 028 ÷ 2 = 9 368 514 + 0;
  • 9 368 514 ÷ 2 = 4 684 257 + 0;
  • 4 684 257 ÷ 2 = 2 342 128 + 1;
  • 2 342 128 ÷ 2 = 1 171 064 + 0;
  • 1 171 064 ÷ 2 = 585 532 + 0;
  • 585 532 ÷ 2 = 292 766 + 0;
  • 292 766 ÷ 2 = 146 383 + 0;
  • 146 383 ÷ 2 = 73 191 + 1;
  • 73 191 ÷ 2 = 36 595 + 1;
  • 36 595 ÷ 2 = 18 297 + 1;
  • 18 297 ÷ 2 = 9 148 + 1;
  • 9 148 ÷ 2 = 4 574 + 0;
  • 4 574 ÷ 2 = 2 287 + 0;
  • 2 287 ÷ 2 = 1 143 + 1;
  • 1 143 ÷ 2 = 571 + 1;
  • 571 ÷ 2 = 285 + 1;
  • 285 ÷ 2 = 142 + 1;
  • 142 ÷ 2 = 71 + 0;
  • 71 ÷ 2 = 35 + 1;
  • 35 ÷ 2 = 17 + 1;
  • 17 ÷ 2 = 8 + 1;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

2. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

599 584 915(10) =


10 0011 1011 1100 1111 0000 1001 0011(2)


3. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.999 999 999 999 119 196 2.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.


Keep track of each integer part of the results.


Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.999 999 999 999 119 196 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 998 238 392 4;
  • 2) 0.999 999 999 998 238 392 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 996 476 784 8;
  • 3) 0.999 999 999 996 476 784 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 992 953 569 6;
  • 4) 0.999 999 999 992 953 569 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 985 907 139 2;
  • 5) 0.999 999 999 985 907 139 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 971 814 278 4;
  • 6) 0.999 999 999 971 814 278 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 943 628 556 8;
  • 7) 0.999 999 999 943 628 556 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 887 257 113 6;
  • 8) 0.999 999 999 887 257 113 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 774 514 227 2;
  • 9) 0.999 999 999 774 514 227 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 549 028 454 4;
  • 10) 0.999 999 999 549 028 454 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 999 098 056 908 8;
  • 11) 0.999 999 999 098 056 908 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 998 196 113 817 6;
  • 12) 0.999 999 998 196 113 817 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 996 392 227 635 2;
  • 13) 0.999 999 996 392 227 635 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 992 784 455 270 4;
  • 14) 0.999 999 992 784 455 270 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 985 568 910 540 8;
  • 15) 0.999 999 985 568 910 540 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 971 137 821 081 6;
  • 16) 0.999 999 971 137 821 081 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 942 275 642 163 2;
  • 17) 0.999 999 942 275 642 163 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 884 551 284 326 4;
  • 18) 0.999 999 884 551 284 326 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 769 102 568 652 8;
  • 19) 0.999 999 769 102 568 652 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 538 205 137 305 6;
  • 20) 0.999 999 538 205 137 305 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 999 076 410 274 611 2;
  • 21) 0.999 999 076 410 274 611 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 998 152 820 549 222 4;
  • 22) 0.999 998 152 820 549 222 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 996 305 641 098 444 8;
  • 23) 0.999 996 305 641 098 444 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 992 611 282 196 889 6;
  • 24) 0.999 992 611 282 196 889 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 985 222 564 393 779 2;
  • 25) 0.999 985 222 564 393 779 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 970 445 128 787 558 4;
  • 26) 0.999 970 445 128 787 558 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 940 890 257 575 116 8;
  • 27) 0.999 940 890 257 575 116 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 881 780 515 150 233 6;
  • 28) 0.999 881 780 515 150 233 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 763 561 030 300 467 2;
  • 29) 0.999 763 561 030 300 467 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 527 122 060 600 934 4;
  • 30) 0.999 527 122 060 600 934 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.999 054 244 121 201 868 8;
  • 31) 0.999 054 244 121 201 868 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.998 108 488 242 403 737 6;
  • 32) 0.998 108 488 242 403 737 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.996 216 976 484 807 475 2;
  • 33) 0.996 216 976 484 807 475 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.992 433 952 969 614 950 4;
  • 34) 0.992 433 952 969 614 950 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.984 867 905 939 229 900 8;
  • 35) 0.984 867 905 939 229 900 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.969 735 811 878 459 801 6;
  • 36) 0.969 735 811 878 459 801 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.939 471 623 756 919 603 2;
  • 37) 0.939 471 623 756 919 603 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.878 943 247 513 839 206 4;
  • 38) 0.878 943 247 513 839 206 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.757 886 495 027 678 412 8;
  • 39) 0.757 886 495 027 678 412 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.515 772 990 055 356 825 6;
  • 40) 0.515 772 990 055 356 825 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.031 545 980 110 713 651 2;
  • 41) 0.031 545 980 110 713 651 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.063 091 960 221 427 302 4;
  • 42) 0.063 091 960 221 427 302 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.126 183 920 442 854 604 8;
  • 43) 0.126 183 920 442 854 604 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.252 367 840 885 709 209 6;
  • 44) 0.252 367 840 885 709 209 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.504 735 681 771 418 419 2;
  • 45) 0.504 735 681 771 418 419 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.009 471 363 542 836 838 4;
  • 46) 0.009 471 363 542 836 838 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.018 942 727 085 673 676 8;
  • 47) 0.018 942 727 085 673 676 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.037 885 454 171 347 353 6;
  • 48) 0.037 885 454 171 347 353 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.075 770 908 342 694 707 2;
  • 49) 0.075 770 908 342 694 707 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.151 541 816 685 389 414 4;
  • 50) 0.151 541 816 685 389 414 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.303 083 633 370 778 828 8;
  • 51) 0.303 083 633 370 778 828 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.606 167 266 741 557 657 6;
  • 52) 0.606 167 266 741 557 657 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.212 334 533 483 115 315 2;
  • 53) 0.212 334 533 483 115 315 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.424 669 066 966 230 630 4;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


4. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.999 999 999 999 119 196 2(10) =


0.1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 0000 1000 0001 0(2)

5. Positive number before normalization:

599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2(10) =


10 0011 1011 1100 1111 0000 1001 0011.1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 0000 1000 0001 0(2)

6. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 29 positions to the left, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2(10) =


10 0011 1011 1100 1111 0000 1001 0011.1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 0000 1000 0001 0(2) =


10 0011 1011 1100 1111 0000 1001 0011.1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 0000 1000 0001 0(2) × 20 =


1.0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1000 0100 0000 10(2) × 229


7. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 0 (a positive number)


Exponent (unadjusted): 29


Mantissa (not normalized):
1.0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1000 0100 0000 10


8. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =


Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =


29 + 2(11-1) - 1 =


(29 + 1 023)(10) =


1 052(10)


9. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 052 ÷ 2 = 526 + 0;
  • 526 ÷ 2 = 263 + 0;
  • 263 ÷ 2 = 131 + 1;
  • 131 ÷ 2 = 65 + 1;
  • 65 ÷ 2 = 32 + 1;
  • 32 ÷ 2 = 16 + 0;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

10. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =


1052(10) =


100 0001 1100(2)


11. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.


b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (if any of the excess bits is set on 1, we are losing precision...).


Mantissa (normalized) =


1. 0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 11 1111 1111 1111 1110 0001 0000 0010 =


0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111


12. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
0 (a positive number)


Exponent (11 bits) =
100 0001 1100


Mantissa (52 bits) =
0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111


Decimal number 599 584 915.999 999 999 999 119 196 2 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

0 - 100 0001 1100 - 0001 1101 1110 0111 1000 0100 1001 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111 1111


How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100