0.052 631 591 1 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal 0.052 631 591 1(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
0.052 631 591 1(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 0.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 0 ÷ 2 = 0 + 0;

2. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

0(10) =

0(2)


3. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.052 631 591 1.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each integer part of the results.

Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.052 631 591 1 × 2 = 0 + 0.105 263 182 2;
  • 2) 0.105 263 182 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.210 526 364 4;
  • 3) 0.210 526 364 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.421 052 728 8;
  • 4) 0.421 052 728 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.842 105 457 6;
  • 5) 0.842 105 457 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.684 210 915 2;
  • 6) 0.684 210 915 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.368 421 830 4;
  • 7) 0.368 421 830 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.736 843 660 8;
  • 8) 0.736 843 660 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.473 687 321 6;
  • 9) 0.473 687 321 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.947 374 643 2;
  • 10) 0.947 374 643 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.894 749 286 4;
  • 11) 0.894 749 286 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 498 572 8;
  • 12) 0.789 498 572 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 997 145 6;
  • 13) 0.578 997 145 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 994 291 2;
  • 14) 0.157 994 291 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 988 582 4;
  • 15) 0.315 988 582 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 977 164 8;
  • 16) 0.631 977 164 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.263 954 329 6;
  • 17) 0.263 954 329 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.527 908 659 2;
  • 18) 0.527 908 659 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.055 817 318 4;
  • 19) 0.055 817 318 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.111 634 636 8;
  • 20) 0.111 634 636 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.223 269 273 6;
  • 21) 0.223 269 273 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.446 538 547 2;
  • 22) 0.446 538 547 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.893 077 094 4;
  • 23) 0.893 077 094 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.786 154 188 8;
  • 24) 0.786 154 188 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.572 308 377 6;
  • 25) 0.572 308 377 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.144 616 755 2;
  • 26) 0.144 616 755 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.289 233 510 4;
  • 27) 0.289 233 510 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.578 467 020 8;
  • 28) 0.578 467 020 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.156 934 041 6;
  • 29) 0.156 934 041 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.313 868 083 2;
  • 30) 0.313 868 083 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.627 736 166 4;
  • 31) 0.627 736 166 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.255 472 332 8;
  • 32) 0.255 472 332 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.510 944 665 6;
  • 33) 0.510 944 665 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.021 889 331 2;
  • 34) 0.021 889 331 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.043 778 662 4;
  • 35) 0.043 778 662 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.087 557 324 8;
  • 36) 0.087 557 324 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.175 114 649 6;
  • 37) 0.175 114 649 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.350 229 299 2;
  • 38) 0.350 229 299 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.700 458 598 4;
  • 39) 0.700 458 598 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.400 917 196 8;
  • 40) 0.400 917 196 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.801 834 393 6;
  • 41) 0.801 834 393 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.603 668 787 2;
  • 42) 0.603 668 787 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.207 337 574 4;
  • 43) 0.207 337 574 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.414 675 148 8;
  • 44) 0.414 675 148 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.829 350 297 6;
  • 45) 0.829 350 297 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.658 700 595 2;
  • 46) 0.658 700 595 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.317 401 190 4;
  • 47) 0.317 401 190 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.634 802 380 8;
  • 48) 0.634 802 380 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 604 761 6;
  • 49) 0.269 604 761 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.539 209 523 2;
  • 50) 0.539 209 523 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.078 419 046 4;
  • 51) 0.078 419 046 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.156 838 092 8;
  • 52) 0.156 838 092 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.313 676 185 6;
  • 53) 0.313 676 185 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.627 352 371 2;
  • 54) 0.627 352 371 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.254 704 742 4;
  • 55) 0.254 704 742 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.509 409 484 8;
  • 56) 0.509 409 484 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.018 818 969 6;
  • 57) 0.018 818 969 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.037 637 939 2;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


4. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.052 631 591 1(10) =

0.0000 1101 0111 1001 0100 0011 1001 0010 1000 0010 1100 1101 0100 0101 0(2)

5. Positive number before normalization:

0.052 631 591 1(10) =

0.0000 1101 0111 1001 0100 0011 1001 0010 1000 0010 1100 1101 0100 0101 0(2)

6. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 5 positions to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


0.052 631 591 1(10) =

0.0000 1101 0111 1001 0100 0011 1001 0010 1000 0010 1100 1101 0100 0101 0(2) =

0.0000 1101 0111 1001 0100 0011 1001 0010 1000 0010 1100 1101 0100 0101 0(2) × 20 =

1.1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010(2) × 2-5


7. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 0 (a positive number)

Exponent (unadjusted): -5

Mantissa (not normalized):
1.1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010


8. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =

Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =

-5 + 2(11-1) - 1 =

(-5 + 1 023)(10) =

1 018(10)


9. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 018 ÷ 2 = 509 + 0;
  • 509 ÷ 2 = 254 + 1;
  • 254 ÷ 2 = 127 + 0;
  • 127 ÷ 2 = 63 + 1;
  • 63 ÷ 2 = 31 + 1;
  • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
  • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
  • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
  • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

10. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =

1018(10) =

011 1111 1010(2)


11. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.

b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, only if necessary (not the case here).


Mantissa (normalized) =

1. 1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010 =

1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010


12. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
0 (a positive number)

Exponent (11 bits) =
011 1111 1010

Mantissa (52 bits) =
1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010


Decimal number 0.052 631 591 1 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

0 - 011 1111 1010 - 1010 1111 0010 1000 0111 0010 0101 0000 0101 1001 1010 1000 1010

Share

» Convert decimal 0.052 631 600 6 to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard

» Calculations Performed by Our Visitors: Decimal Numbers Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard. Data organized on a Monthly Basis

» Month 04, 2026 [April]: Decimal Numbers Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard. Calculations performed during the month of: April - by our visitors

» Improve your social skills: The Attention Economy - The Battlefield For Your Focus. NotebookLM YouTube Video of 7.50 minutes

How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100