-5 104.859 599 825 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal -5 104.859 599 825(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
-5 104.859 599 825(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. Start with the positive version of the number:

|-5 104.859 599 825| = 5 104.859 599 825


2. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 5 104.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 5 104 ÷ 2 = 2 552 + 0;
  • 2 552 ÷ 2 = 1 276 + 0;
  • 1 276 ÷ 2 = 638 + 0;
  • 638 ÷ 2 = 319 + 0;
  • 319 ÷ 2 = 159 + 1;
  • 159 ÷ 2 = 79 + 1;
  • 79 ÷ 2 = 39 + 1;
  • 39 ÷ 2 = 19 + 1;
  • 19 ÷ 2 = 9 + 1;
  • 9 ÷ 2 = 4 + 1;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

5 104(10) =


1 0011 1111 0000(2)


4. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.859 599 825.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.


Keep track of each integer part of the results.


Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.859 599 825 × 2 = 1 + 0.719 199 65;
  • 2) 0.719 199 65 × 2 = 1 + 0.438 399 3;
  • 3) 0.438 399 3 × 2 = 0 + 0.876 798 6;
  • 4) 0.876 798 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.753 597 2;
  • 5) 0.753 597 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.507 194 4;
  • 6) 0.507 194 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.014 388 8;
  • 7) 0.014 388 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.028 777 6;
  • 8) 0.028 777 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.057 555 2;
  • 9) 0.057 555 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.115 110 4;
  • 10) 0.115 110 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.230 220 8;
  • 11) 0.230 220 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.460 441 6;
  • 12) 0.460 441 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.920 883 2;
  • 13) 0.920 883 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.841 766 4;
  • 14) 0.841 766 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.683 532 8;
  • 15) 0.683 532 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.367 065 6;
  • 16) 0.367 065 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.734 131 2;
  • 17) 0.734 131 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.468 262 4;
  • 18) 0.468 262 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.936 524 8;
  • 19) 0.936 524 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.873 049 6;
  • 20) 0.873 049 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.746 099 2;
  • 21) 0.746 099 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.492 198 4;
  • 22) 0.492 198 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.984 396 8;
  • 23) 0.984 396 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.968 793 6;
  • 24) 0.968 793 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.937 587 2;
  • 25) 0.937 587 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.875 174 4;
  • 26) 0.875 174 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.750 348 8;
  • 27) 0.750 348 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.500 697 6;
  • 28) 0.500 697 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.001 395 2;
  • 29) 0.001 395 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.002 790 4;
  • 30) 0.002 790 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.005 580 8;
  • 31) 0.005 580 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.011 161 6;
  • 32) 0.011 161 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.022 323 2;
  • 33) 0.022 323 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.044 646 4;
  • 34) 0.044 646 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.089 292 8;
  • 35) 0.089 292 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.178 585 6;
  • 36) 0.178 585 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.357 171 2;
  • 37) 0.357 171 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.714 342 4;
  • 38) 0.714 342 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.428 684 8;
  • 39) 0.428 684 8 × 2 = 0 + 0.857 369 6;
  • 40) 0.857 369 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.714 739 2;
  • 41) 0.714 739 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.429 478 4;
  • 42) 0.429 478 4 × 2 = 0 + 0.858 956 8;
  • 43) 0.858 956 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.717 913 6;
  • 44) 0.717 913 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.435 827 2;
  • 45) 0.435 827 2 × 2 = 0 + 0.871 654 4;
  • 46) 0.871 654 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.743 308 8;
  • 47) 0.743 308 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.486 617 6;
  • 48) 0.486 617 6 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 235 2;
  • 49) 0.973 235 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.946 470 4;
  • 50) 0.946 470 4 × 2 = 1 + 0.892 940 8;
  • 51) 0.892 940 8 × 2 = 1 + 0.785 881 6;
  • 52) 0.785 881 6 × 2 = 1 + 0.571 763 2;
  • 53) 0.571 763 2 × 2 = 1 + 0.143 526 4;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.859 599 825(10) =


0.1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1(2)

6. Positive number before normalization:

5 104.859 599 825(10) =


1 0011 1111 0000.1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1(2)

7. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 12 positions to the left, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


5 104.859 599 825(10) =


1 0011 1111 0000.1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1(2) =


1 0011 1111 0000.1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1(2) × 20 =


1.0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1(2) × 212


8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 1 (a negative number)


Exponent (unadjusted): 12


Mantissa (not normalized):
1.0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1011 0110 1111 1


9. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =


Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =


12 + 2(11-1) - 1 =


(12 + 1 023)(10) =


1 035(10)


10. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 035 ÷ 2 = 517 + 1;
  • 517 ÷ 2 = 258 + 1;
  • 258 ÷ 2 = 129 + 0;
  • 129 ÷ 2 = 64 + 1;
  • 64 ÷ 2 = 32 + 0;
  • 32 ÷ 2 = 16 + 0;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

11. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =


1035(10) =


100 0000 1011(2)


12. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.


b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (if any of the excess bits is set on 1, we are losing precision...).


Mantissa (normalized) =


1. 0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101 1 0110 1101 1111 =


0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101


13. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
1 (a negative number)


Exponent (11 bits) =
100 0000 1011


Mantissa (52 bits) =
0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101


Decimal number -5 104.859 599 825 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

1 - 100 0000 1011 - 0011 1111 0000 1101 1100 0000 1110 1011 1011 1111 0000 0000 0101


How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100