9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5 Converted to 64 Bit Double Precision IEEE 754 Binary Floating Point Representation Standard

Convert decimal 9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation standard (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

What are the steps to convert decimal number
9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5(10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation (1 bit for sign, 11 bits for exponent, 52 bits for mantissa)

1. First, convert to binary (in base 2) the integer part: 9 007 199 254 740 996.
Divide the number repeatedly by 2.

Keep track of each remainder.

We stop when we get a quotient that is equal to zero.


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 9 007 199 254 740 996 ÷ 2 = 4 503 599 627 370 498 + 0;
  • 4 503 599 627 370 498 ÷ 2 = 2 251 799 813 685 249 + 0;
  • 2 251 799 813 685 249 ÷ 2 = 1 125 899 906 842 624 + 1;
  • 1 125 899 906 842 624 ÷ 2 = 562 949 953 421 312 + 0;
  • 562 949 953 421 312 ÷ 2 = 281 474 976 710 656 + 0;
  • 281 474 976 710 656 ÷ 2 = 140 737 488 355 328 + 0;
  • 140 737 488 355 328 ÷ 2 = 70 368 744 177 664 + 0;
  • 70 368 744 177 664 ÷ 2 = 35 184 372 088 832 + 0;
  • 35 184 372 088 832 ÷ 2 = 17 592 186 044 416 + 0;
  • 17 592 186 044 416 ÷ 2 = 8 796 093 022 208 + 0;
  • 8 796 093 022 208 ÷ 2 = 4 398 046 511 104 + 0;
  • 4 398 046 511 104 ÷ 2 = 2 199 023 255 552 + 0;
  • 2 199 023 255 552 ÷ 2 = 1 099 511 627 776 + 0;
  • 1 099 511 627 776 ÷ 2 = 549 755 813 888 + 0;
  • 549 755 813 888 ÷ 2 = 274 877 906 944 + 0;
  • 274 877 906 944 ÷ 2 = 137 438 953 472 + 0;
  • 137 438 953 472 ÷ 2 = 68 719 476 736 + 0;
  • 68 719 476 736 ÷ 2 = 34 359 738 368 + 0;
  • 34 359 738 368 ÷ 2 = 17 179 869 184 + 0;
  • 17 179 869 184 ÷ 2 = 8 589 934 592 + 0;
  • 8 589 934 592 ÷ 2 = 4 294 967 296 + 0;
  • 4 294 967 296 ÷ 2 = 2 147 483 648 + 0;
  • 2 147 483 648 ÷ 2 = 1 073 741 824 + 0;
  • 1 073 741 824 ÷ 2 = 536 870 912 + 0;
  • 536 870 912 ÷ 2 = 268 435 456 + 0;
  • 268 435 456 ÷ 2 = 134 217 728 + 0;
  • 134 217 728 ÷ 2 = 67 108 864 + 0;
  • 67 108 864 ÷ 2 = 33 554 432 + 0;
  • 33 554 432 ÷ 2 = 16 777 216 + 0;
  • 16 777 216 ÷ 2 = 8 388 608 + 0;
  • 8 388 608 ÷ 2 = 4 194 304 + 0;
  • 4 194 304 ÷ 2 = 2 097 152 + 0;
  • 2 097 152 ÷ 2 = 1 048 576 + 0;
  • 1 048 576 ÷ 2 = 524 288 + 0;
  • 524 288 ÷ 2 = 262 144 + 0;
  • 262 144 ÷ 2 = 131 072 + 0;
  • 131 072 ÷ 2 = 65 536 + 0;
  • 65 536 ÷ 2 = 32 768 + 0;
  • 32 768 ÷ 2 = 16 384 + 0;
  • 16 384 ÷ 2 = 8 192 + 0;
  • 8 192 ÷ 2 = 4 096 + 0;
  • 4 096 ÷ 2 = 2 048 + 0;
  • 2 048 ÷ 2 = 1 024 + 0;
  • 1 024 ÷ 2 = 512 + 0;
  • 512 ÷ 2 = 256 + 0;
  • 256 ÷ 2 = 128 + 0;
  • 128 ÷ 2 = 64 + 0;
  • 64 ÷ 2 = 32 + 0;
  • 32 ÷ 2 = 16 + 0;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

2. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.

9 007 199 254 740 996(10) =


10 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100(2)


3. Convert to binary (base 2) the fractional part: 0.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5.

Multiply it repeatedly by 2.


Keep track of each integer part of the results.


Stop when we get a fractional part that is equal to zero.


  • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
  • 1) 0.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5 × 2 = 1 + 0.180 031 265 539 377 645 845 327;
  • 2) 0.180 031 265 539 377 645 845 327 × 2 = 0 + 0.360 062 531 078 755 291 690 654;
  • 3) 0.360 062 531 078 755 291 690 654 × 2 = 0 + 0.720 125 062 157 510 583 381 308;
  • 4) 0.720 125 062 157 510 583 381 308 × 2 = 1 + 0.440 250 124 315 021 166 762 616;
  • 5) 0.440 250 124 315 021 166 762 616 × 2 = 0 + 0.880 500 248 630 042 333 525 232;
  • 6) 0.880 500 248 630 042 333 525 232 × 2 = 1 + 0.761 000 497 260 084 667 050 464;
  • 7) 0.761 000 497 260 084 667 050 464 × 2 = 1 + 0.522 000 994 520 169 334 100 928;
  • 8) 0.522 000 994 520 169 334 100 928 × 2 = 1 + 0.044 001 989 040 338 668 201 856;
  • 9) 0.044 001 989 040 338 668 201 856 × 2 = 0 + 0.088 003 978 080 677 336 403 712;
  • 10) 0.088 003 978 080 677 336 403 712 × 2 = 0 + 0.176 007 956 161 354 672 807 424;
  • 11) 0.176 007 956 161 354 672 807 424 × 2 = 0 + 0.352 015 912 322 709 345 614 848;
  • 12) 0.352 015 912 322 709 345 614 848 × 2 = 0 + 0.704 031 824 645 418 691 229 696;
  • 13) 0.704 031 824 645 418 691 229 696 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 063 649 290 837 382 459 392;
  • 14) 0.408 063 649 290 837 382 459 392 × 2 = 0 + 0.816 127 298 581 674 764 918 784;
  • 15) 0.816 127 298 581 674 764 918 784 × 2 = 1 + 0.632 254 597 163 349 529 837 568;
  • 16) 0.632 254 597 163 349 529 837 568 × 2 = 1 + 0.264 509 194 326 699 059 675 136;
  • 17) 0.264 509 194 326 699 059 675 136 × 2 = 0 + 0.529 018 388 653 398 119 350 272;
  • 18) 0.529 018 388 653 398 119 350 272 × 2 = 1 + 0.058 036 777 306 796 238 700 544;
  • 19) 0.058 036 777 306 796 238 700 544 × 2 = 0 + 0.116 073 554 613 592 477 401 088;
  • 20) 0.116 073 554 613 592 477 401 088 × 2 = 0 + 0.232 147 109 227 184 954 802 176;
  • 21) 0.232 147 109 227 184 954 802 176 × 2 = 0 + 0.464 294 218 454 369 909 604 352;
  • 22) 0.464 294 218 454 369 909 604 352 × 2 = 0 + 0.928 588 436 908 739 819 208 704;
  • 23) 0.928 588 436 908 739 819 208 704 × 2 = 1 + 0.857 176 873 817 479 638 417 408;
  • 24) 0.857 176 873 817 479 638 417 408 × 2 = 1 + 0.714 353 747 634 959 276 834 816;
  • 25) 0.714 353 747 634 959 276 834 816 × 2 = 1 + 0.428 707 495 269 918 553 669 632;
  • 26) 0.428 707 495 269 918 553 669 632 × 2 = 0 + 0.857 414 990 539 837 107 339 264;
  • 27) 0.857 414 990 539 837 107 339 264 × 2 = 1 + 0.714 829 981 079 674 214 678 528;
  • 28) 0.714 829 981 079 674 214 678 528 × 2 = 1 + 0.429 659 962 159 348 429 357 056;
  • 29) 0.429 659 962 159 348 429 357 056 × 2 = 0 + 0.859 319 924 318 696 858 714 112;
  • 30) 0.859 319 924 318 696 858 714 112 × 2 = 1 + 0.718 639 848 637 393 717 428 224;
  • 31) 0.718 639 848 637 393 717 428 224 × 2 = 1 + 0.437 279 697 274 787 434 856 448;
  • 32) 0.437 279 697 274 787 434 856 448 × 2 = 0 + 0.874 559 394 549 574 869 712 896;
  • 33) 0.874 559 394 549 574 869 712 896 × 2 = 1 + 0.749 118 789 099 149 739 425 792;
  • 34) 0.749 118 789 099 149 739 425 792 × 2 = 1 + 0.498 237 578 198 299 478 851 584;
  • 35) 0.498 237 578 198 299 478 851 584 × 2 = 0 + 0.996 475 156 396 598 957 703 168;
  • 36) 0.996 475 156 396 598 957 703 168 × 2 = 1 + 0.992 950 312 793 197 915 406 336;
  • 37) 0.992 950 312 793 197 915 406 336 × 2 = 1 + 0.985 900 625 586 395 830 812 672;
  • 38) 0.985 900 625 586 395 830 812 672 × 2 = 1 + 0.971 801 251 172 791 661 625 344;
  • 39) 0.971 801 251 172 791 661 625 344 × 2 = 1 + 0.943 602 502 345 583 323 250 688;
  • 40) 0.943 602 502 345 583 323 250 688 × 2 = 1 + 0.887 205 004 691 166 646 501 376;
  • 41) 0.887 205 004 691 166 646 501 376 × 2 = 1 + 0.774 410 009 382 333 293 002 752;
  • 42) 0.774 410 009 382 333 293 002 752 × 2 = 1 + 0.548 820 018 764 666 586 005 504;
  • 43) 0.548 820 018 764 666 586 005 504 × 2 = 1 + 0.097 640 037 529 333 172 011 008;
  • 44) 0.097 640 037 529 333 172 011 008 × 2 = 0 + 0.195 280 075 058 666 344 022 016;
  • 45) 0.195 280 075 058 666 344 022 016 × 2 = 0 + 0.390 560 150 117 332 688 044 032;
  • 46) 0.390 560 150 117 332 688 044 032 × 2 = 0 + 0.781 120 300 234 665 376 088 064;
  • 47) 0.781 120 300 234 665 376 088 064 × 2 = 1 + 0.562 240 600 469 330 752 176 128;
  • 48) 0.562 240 600 469 330 752 176 128 × 2 = 1 + 0.124 481 200 938 661 504 352 256;
  • 49) 0.124 481 200 938 661 504 352 256 × 2 = 0 + 0.248 962 401 877 323 008 704 512;
  • 50) 0.248 962 401 877 323 008 704 512 × 2 = 0 + 0.497 924 803 754 646 017 409 024;
  • 51) 0.497 924 803 754 646 017 409 024 × 2 = 0 + 0.995 849 607 509 292 034 818 048;
  • 52) 0.995 849 607 509 292 034 818 048 × 2 = 1 + 0.991 699 215 018 584 069 636 096;
  • 53) 0.991 699 215 018 584 069 636 096 × 2 = 1 + 0.983 398 430 037 168 139 272 192;

We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit) and at least one integer that was different from zero => FULL STOP (Losing precision - the converted number we get in the end will be just a very good approximation of the initial one).


4. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number.

Take all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:


0.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5(10) =


0.1001 0111 0000 1011 0100 0011 1011 0110 1101 1111 1110 0011 0001 1(2)

5. Positive number before normalization:

9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5(10) =


10 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100.1001 0111 0000 1011 0100 0011 1011 0110 1101 1111 1110 0011 0001 1(2)

6. Normalize the binary representation of the number.

Shift the decimal mark 53 positions to the left, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of it:


9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5(10) =


10 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100.1001 0111 0000 1011 0100 0011 1011 0110 1101 1111 1110 0011 0001 1(2) =


10 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0100.1001 0111 0000 1011 0100 0011 1011 0110 1101 1111 1110 0011 0001 1(2) × 20 =


1.0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010 0100 1011 1000 0101 1010 0001 1101 1011 0110 1111 1111 0001 1000 11(2) × 253


7. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign 0 (a positive number)


Exponent (unadjusted): 53


Mantissa (not normalized):
1.0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010 0100 1011 1000 0101 1010 0001 1101 1011 0110 1111 1111 0001 1000 11


8. Adjust the exponent.

Use the 11 bit excess/bias notation:


Exponent (adjusted) =


Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 =


53 + 2(11-1) - 1 =


(53 + 1 023)(10) =


1 076(10)


9. Convert the adjusted exponent from the decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary.

Use the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2:


  • division = quotient + remainder;
  • 1 076 ÷ 2 = 538 + 0;
  • 538 ÷ 2 = 269 + 0;
  • 269 ÷ 2 = 134 + 1;
  • 134 ÷ 2 = 67 + 0;
  • 67 ÷ 2 = 33 + 1;
  • 33 ÷ 2 = 16 + 1;
  • 16 ÷ 2 = 8 + 0;
  • 8 ÷ 2 = 4 + 0;
  • 4 ÷ 2 = 2 + 0;
  • 2 ÷ 2 = 1 + 0;
  • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;

10. Construct the base 2 representation of the adjusted exponent.

Take all the remainders starting from the bottom of the list constructed above.


Exponent (adjusted) =


1076(10) =


100 0011 0100(2)


11. Normalize the mantissa.

a) Remove the leading (the leftmost) bit, since it's allways 1, and the decimal point, if the case.


b) Adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (if any of the excess bits is set on 1, we are losing precision...).


Mantissa (normalized) =


1. 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010 01 0010 1110 0001 0110 1000 0111 0110 1101 1011 1111 1100 0110 0011 =


0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010


12. The three elements that make up the number's 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

Sign (1 bit) =
0 (a positive number)


Exponent (11 bits) =
100 0011 0100


Mantissa (52 bits) =
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010


Decimal number 9 007 199 254 740 996.590 015 632 769 688 822 922 663 5 converted to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

0 - 100 0011 0100 - 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0010


How to convert numbers from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point standard

Follow the steps below to convert a base 10 decimal number to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. If the number to be converted is negative, start with its the positive version.
  • 2. First convert the integer part. Divide repeatedly by 2 the positive representation of the integer number that is to be converted to binary, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero, keeping track of each remainder.
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the positive integer part of the number, by taking all the remainders from the previous operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above. Thus, the last remainder of the divisions becomes the first symbol (the leftmost) of the base two number, while the first remainder becomes the last symbol (the rightmost).
  • 4. Then convert the fractional part. Multiply the number repeatedly by 2, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero, keeping track of each integer part of the results.
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the multiplying operations, starting from the top of the list constructed above (they should appear in the binary representation, from left to right, in the order they have been calculated).
  • 6. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark (the decimal point) "n" positions either to the left, or to the right, so that only one non zero digit remains to the left of the decimal mark.
  • 7. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary, by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing by 2, as shown above:
    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1
  • 8. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal mark, if the case) and adjust its length to 52 bits, either by removing the excess bits from the right (losing precision...) or by adding extra bits set on '0' to the right.
  • 9. Sign (it takes 1 bit) is either 1 for a negative or 0 for a positive number.

Example: convert the negative number -31.640 215 from the decimal system (base ten) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point:

  • 1. Start with the positive version of the number:

    |-31.640 215| = 31.640 215

  • 2. First convert the integer part, 31. Divide it repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each remainder, until we get a quotient that is equal to zero:
    • division = quotient + remainder;
    • 31 ÷ 2 = 15 + 1;
    • 15 ÷ 2 = 7 + 1;
    • 7 ÷ 2 = 3 + 1;
    • 3 ÷ 2 = 1 + 1;
    • 1 ÷ 2 = 0 + 1;
    • We have encountered a quotient that is ZERO => FULL STOP
  • 3. Construct the base 2 representation of the integer part of the number by taking all the remainders of the previous dividing operations, starting from the bottom of the list constructed above:

    31(10) = 1 1111(2)

  • 4. Then, convert the fractional part, 0.640 215. Multiply repeatedly by 2, keeping track of each integer part of the results, until we get a fractional part that is equal to zero:
    • #) multiplying = integer + fractional part;
    • 1) 0.640 215 × 2 = 1 + 0.280 43;
    • 2) 0.280 43 × 2 = 0 + 0.560 86;
    • 3) 0.560 86 × 2 = 1 + 0.121 72;
    • 4) 0.121 72 × 2 = 0 + 0.243 44;
    • 5) 0.243 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.486 88;
    • 6) 0.486 88 × 2 = 0 + 0.973 76;
    • 7) 0.973 76 × 2 = 1 + 0.947 52;
    • 8) 0.947 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.895 04;
    • 9) 0.895 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.790 08;
    • 10) 0.790 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.580 16;
    • 11) 0.580 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.160 32;
    • 12) 0.160 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.320 64;
    • 13) 0.320 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.641 28;
    • 14) 0.641 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.282 56;
    • 15) 0.282 56 × 2 = 0 + 0.565 12;
    • 16) 0.565 12 × 2 = 1 + 0.130 24;
    • 17) 0.130 24 × 2 = 0 + 0.260 48;
    • 18) 0.260 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.520 96;
    • 19) 0.520 96 × 2 = 1 + 0.041 92;
    • 20) 0.041 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.083 84;
    • 21) 0.083 84 × 2 = 0 + 0.167 68;
    • 22) 0.167 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.335 36;
    • 23) 0.335 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.670 72;
    • 24) 0.670 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.341 44;
    • 25) 0.341 44 × 2 = 0 + 0.682 88;
    • 26) 0.682 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.365 76;
    • 27) 0.365 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.731 52;
    • 28) 0.731 52 × 2 = 1 + 0.463 04;
    • 29) 0.463 04 × 2 = 0 + 0.926 08;
    • 30) 0.926 08 × 2 = 1 + 0.852 16;
    • 31) 0.852 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.704 32;
    • 32) 0.704 32 × 2 = 1 + 0.408 64;
    • 33) 0.408 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.817 28;
    • 34) 0.817 28 × 2 = 1 + 0.634 56;
    • 35) 0.634 56 × 2 = 1 + 0.269 12;
    • 36) 0.269 12 × 2 = 0 + 0.538 24;
    • 37) 0.538 24 × 2 = 1 + 0.076 48;
    • 38) 0.076 48 × 2 = 0 + 0.152 96;
    • 39) 0.152 96 × 2 = 0 + 0.305 92;
    • 40) 0.305 92 × 2 = 0 + 0.611 84;
    • 41) 0.611 84 × 2 = 1 + 0.223 68;
    • 42) 0.223 68 × 2 = 0 + 0.447 36;
    • 43) 0.447 36 × 2 = 0 + 0.894 72;
    • 44) 0.894 72 × 2 = 1 + 0.789 44;
    • 45) 0.789 44 × 2 = 1 + 0.578 88;
    • 46) 0.578 88 × 2 = 1 + 0.157 76;
    • 47) 0.157 76 × 2 = 0 + 0.315 52;
    • 48) 0.315 52 × 2 = 0 + 0.631 04;
    • 49) 0.631 04 × 2 = 1 + 0.262 08;
    • 50) 0.262 08 × 2 = 0 + 0.524 16;
    • 51) 0.524 16 × 2 = 1 + 0.048 32;
    • 52) 0.048 32 × 2 = 0 + 0.096 64;
    • 53) 0.096 64 × 2 = 0 + 0.193 28;
    • We didn't get any fractional part that was equal to zero. But we had enough iterations (over Mantissa limit = 52) and at least one integer part that was different from zero => FULL STOP (losing precision...).
  • 5. Construct the base 2 representation of the fractional part of the number, by taking all the integer parts of the previous multiplying operations, starting from the top of the constructed list above:

    0.640 215(10) = 0.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 6. Summarizing - the positive number before normalization:

    31.640 215(10) = 1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2)

  • 7. Normalize the binary representation of the number, shifting the decimal mark 4 positions to the left so that only one non-zero digit stays to the left of the decimal mark:

    31.640 215(10) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) =
    1 1111.1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 20 =
    1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0(2) × 24

  • 8. Up to this moment, there are the following elements that would feed into the 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point representation:

    Sign: 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (unadjusted): 4

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

  • 9. Adjust the exponent in 11 bit excess/bias notation and then convert it from decimal (base 10) to 11 bit binary (base 2), by using the same technique of repeatedly dividing it by 2, as shown above:

    Exponent (adjusted) = Exponent (unadjusted) + 2(11-1) - 1 = (4 + 1023)(10) = 1027(10) =
    100 0000 0011(2)

  • 10. Normalize mantissa, remove the leading (leftmost) bit, since it's allways '1' (and the decimal sign) and adjust its length to 52 bits, by removing the excess bits, from the right (losing precision...):

    Mantissa (not-normalized): 1.1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100 1010 0

    Mantissa (normalized): 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Conclusion:

    Sign (1 bit) = 1 (a negative number)

    Exponent (8 bits) = 100 0000 0011

    Mantissa (52 bits) = 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100

  • Number -31.640 215, converted from decimal system (base 10) to 64 bit double precision IEEE 754 binary floating point =
    1 - 100 0000 0011 - 1111 1010 0011 1110 0101 0010 0001 0101 0111 0110 1000 1001 1100